Welcome

Here you will find poetry, opinion and prose mixed together in roughly equal measure. Add one man available from specialist suppliers only. Stick everything into a blender for five minutes. Stir gently with a wooden spoon, then pour slowly into tall glasses with crushed ice.

No cherries. No little parasols. No curly straws. Let the drink speak for itself.

Ohmigod! Ohmigod!

Wow. For those who have yet to see Torchwood: Children of Earth, broadcast on BBC1 and BBC HD over the last five consecutive nights at prime-time, I won’t spoil it for you by revealing all the storylines and outcome but some mention of key happenings is, when discussing the show, somewhat unavoidable. Just get it watched, soon as you can, alright?

You still might want to skip this article before you join the ranks of six million plus people who were hooked from Day One.

Torchwood: Children of Earth was, simply put, the best British science-fiction/horror TV drama ever made. It has raised the bar considerably. Last night’s finale was so relentlessly exciting and tense, I had to pause it halfway through to take a break for fear of my heart bursting out of my chest.

The show has presented us with the most brilliant well-rounded gay relationship ever committed to camera, with one character being bisexual—or polysexual, as has been said before of Captain Jack–and the other, Ianto Jones, clearly defined as heterosexual until he met Jack and fell in love. The fluidity in both characters’ histories served to confound all those who see sexuality as either/or, and love their labels. And we’ve come a long way since the days of Larry Grayson and John Inman when it comes to presenting gays on TV. Oh, how I wish I’d had role models like Ianto and Jack when I was a kid!

But what have the writers done to Captain Jack? Without detailing the circumstances into which he was placed, or the decisions he made, it can be said that the character has been utterly devastated, his life comparable to that of Job’s in the Bible—plague after plague of personal horrors, with Jack cursed not by God, unlike Job, but by immortality, for which if anyone is to blame it is The Doctor. But Job’s faith was being tested; Jack had no faith, other than in humanity itself, and he only sought to do the right thing by as many people as possible. It was his constant seeing of the bigger picture that, it seems, in the end cost him his soul. Will he regain it? Well, series 4 is apparently written and awaiting the go-ahead from the BBC. So we’ll see. But after what Jack did, it’s hard to imagine ever seeing the character in quite the same light as we did before. For many, myself included, the resolution to Torchwood: Children of Earth was a step too far on the part of the writers, despite the fact that we know it was an act of perverse brilliance, perfectly undesirable from the viewer’s perspective. I was not the only one to cry out at more than one juncture during the final two episodes. You could almost hear the howls of anguish on Twitter, which has been alive with Torchwood buzz all week.

@N07/2840482763">08/09/2008 10:14
Image by @N07/2840482763">alun.vega via Flickr

The motivation of the aliens, when revealed, was sick genius. The image of one of the stolen children inside the tank will stay with me for a very long time. But where next for Torchwood? And will we have to wait another two years to see what happens next? Torchwood: Children of Earth was produced well over a year ago, more like two years. It was promised for January, meaning we’d gone well over a year without new episodes, only to be put back to the height of summer and still, with that notoriously stupid time to put out a new series of anything, it became the talk of Britain.

We all had doubts about the switch to just five episodes, down from 13, and all of them aired in one week, but the change worked because the show has matured in order to pull in audiences more used to Spooks than Doctor Who. I’m not sure it would work a second time but series 3 being a new format for the show allowed it to change emphasis and approach. I didn’t miss the voiceover intro of series 1 and 2 but appreciated just a hint of the old theme music remaining.

I thought series 1, all those involved in its making so desperate for the show to be seen as adult and distinct from Doctor Who, came across as puerile with gratuitous violence and sex; series 2 retreated from all that, and the original premise that this was not a show for children was reversed, with child-friendly cut episodes being broadcast in the early evenings; series 3, however, got things just right. It was not for children, sex was handled without sensation, and it featured no gore with violence used in ways that furthered the narrative, and not very often. We hardly ever saw the aliens, and when we did we didn’t see them clearly. This worked. The drama was the thing, not the monsters—though monsters they were, hell yes.

In series 1 mention of The Doctor was taboo but by the time we got to Torchwood: Children of Earth fans would all no doubt have been delighted to hear the Time Lord name-checked on more than one occasion; indeed, Gwen’s speech for posterity on Day Five was almost entirely preoccupied with the questions, ‘why was the Doctor nowhere to be seen?’ and, ‘what must the Doctor think of us?’.

Strangely, mentioning the Doctor did not weaken the show’s ability to stand on its own two feet; rather, it provided justification for its existence not as a side-dish, but a main meal in its own right.

If Torchwood were to end, I’d argue for Gwen as a companion for the new 11th Doctor: she’s gutsy, confident, powerful—and would be the perfect foil for a perceptually very young Doctor. But her being with child rather precludes that coming to pass, doesn’t it?

The BBC has allowed for something very interesting in allowing Russell T Davies to take many of the core qualities of Doctor Who and make something as powerfully adult as Torchwood. It reminds me in its tone and content of the Virgin series of books released in the 1990s, The New Adventures, in which writers sought to bring us Doctor Who for grown-ups with, at the time, the Time Lord’s fan base not shrinking but definitely, for the most part, ageing. Of course that trend was reversed as soon as Christopher Eccleston burst onto our screens in the role in 2005. But the need to provide something extra, something more sophisticated and adult, for fans of the classic series remained. RTD answered the call.

We can but hope to see more of Captain Jack, Gwen and… Who knows? Will the apparently amoral (until Day Five) assassin join the team? She’d be a perfect foil for Jack, always unpredictable, edgy and aggressive. Will the courageous PR assistant return? She’d be an ally for the gentler but still steely Gwen, perhaps more vulnerable in series 4 with a child to raise? We can only hope there is another series, and that it airs in 2010–not two years from now, or later. But we can say with conviction that Torchwood: Children of Earth was near-perfect, certainly pitch-perfect in tone and presentation save for the last five minutes which were something of an anti-climax. That said, any coda at all would have appeared a little lame following on from the epic end-of-world scenario we were presented with over the past week. It would be quibbling to spend too much time dissing those five minutes when all that came before brought us so much entertainment and horror, so many surprises, and a lot of shocks.

This show broke new ground. It was unmissable TV for anyone, even those who don’t normally like science-fiction. Like I said, just get it watched.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Related Posts:

  1. Fears for other children after witchcraft abuse conviction According to a BBC News report, hundreds of central African children living in the UK may have suffered abuse or even been killed after being accused of Witchcraft, charities say....

View Comments to “Torchwood: Children of Earth”

  1. I love Torchwood, this series made people think too, or so I think lol.

    I blubbed more than once during the week, for several reasons, Friday night I blubbed the most b-b-b-but [edited by site admin because of spoiler] !!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. You did this on Twitter! Here's a link to tell you what 'spoilers' are. I've edited your comment because I think it gave away too much that I was at pains to avoid in the above article. That was definitely too big a giveaway!

  3. Fair enough, I only twittered about *bleeeeeeep* after reading others comments on it and didn't mention other things which made me blub and feel for characters … yeah strangely people tell me Torchwood isn't real and that the people on the screen are only characters played by actors, not really real o_O

    What is the etiquette for spoilers, I know it's telling what's happened but how long a show has been on tv don't you talk about it? I understand more with movies cos sometimes people don't see them for ages but a tv programme???

  4. You might have seen some comments on Twitter. I think it's a sign of good drama when it engages your emotions; if it doesn't, it fails on every level, no matter how good the FX or look and feel, if the script doesn't make you believe – or temporarily suspend disbelief – then it's a bad script. So if people tell you Torchwood isn't real, you tell 'em it's real for the hour it takes to get through one episode from start to finish. If they still don't get it, ask them if they've ever become totally absorbed by a film or TV show, edge of your seat stuff… If they say no, they're lying. Tell 'em that's the feeling and thinking you're talking about.

    The etiquette for spoilers is, I think, on the link I provided above. But basically, in comments you have to take note of the tone of the piece. If it reveals all, I guess you can't compound it any further by following the lead, but if the show's only recently aired it's still very bad form on the article author's part to do that kind of exposure of every plot detail. As for what counts as 'recently aired' there seems no fixed agreement: some say a few weeks but others prefer to adopt a more generous international position, allowing for shows screened at home to travel the world. Personally – and this is only my view – I'd say allow three or four weeks to pass. I'm not too concerned about whether a show made in the UK has had time to travel to, say, New Zealand or the US – simply because, if people are so interested they'll know about the series before it hits their own channels, then they're likely to bite the bullet and grab copies via BitTorrent ahead of any official scheduling.

    Of course the TV networks could combat piracy of this kind by managing between them to agree global simultaneous broadcasts but that's never going to happen. One, getting them to agree depends on prices asked and prices prepared to pay. Two, networks often like to see how a show faired in its home nation before they'll even consider buying it. And three… Well. Three is they're motivated by greed and opportunism, and such 'values' if you can call them never provide for reasonable, fair, universalist outcomes.

    There is a four. Four, DVD and Blu-Ray, computer games and all other merchandising, they all complicate matters still further as they are often released by companies other than the one that made and/or commissioned a show, and they come out at different times, again, in different formats, with different extras, region code-locked, and so on and so forth. When you've got agreements alongside agreements, it's hard to see how they can all be boiled down to one single gentlemens' agreement. Especially as there are few gentlemen, if any, in the media. At least not these days.

    So yeah. I'd say allow three to four weeks. And if you see full disclosure elsewhere, whether blogs or newspapers, just days after broadcast, then it's definitely unfair and quite possibly in absolute disregard of netiquette where spoilers are concerned.

  5. Sue says:

    I won't give away any spoilers. Matthew, the kiddo, and I watched it. All I can add is I agree with you. Awesome!!! Just watch with lots of tissues. I cried quite a bit through it.

  6. I'm so glad you guys in Canada got to see it. I knew Matthew would certainly be in thrall throughout the five hours!

  7. I'm so glad you guys in Canada got to see it. I knew Matthew would certainly be in thrall throughout the five hours!

blog comments powered by Disqus

Follow

Facebook Likes

Time Machine

Translate this Page

© 2010 The Spicy CauldronSuffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site